
Why governance is key to safe AI adoption
A new CSA report stresses getting out in front of AI risk — and why it matters for SecOps.
Runtime software verification is the process of validating the integrity, behavior, and security posture of software while it is actively running in production or pre-production environments. Unlike static testing or pre-deployment checks, runtime verification continuously monitors how software behaves under real-world conditions to detect anomalies, unauthorized changes, or malicious activity.
It ensures that deployed applications remain trustworthy and compliant throughout their operational lifecycle.
Even after rigorous pre-deployment testing, software can be compromised at runtime due to:
Runtime verification:
This is especially critical in regulated environments, Zero Trust architectures, and for mission-critical software systems.
Runtime verification typically involves:
This can be implemented through technologies like Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP), eBPF-based sensors, endpoint detection agents, or kernel-level monitoring tools.
Practice | Focus Area | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
Static Analysis | Source or binary review | Runtime verification observes live behavior, not code structure |
CI/CD Scanning | Pre-deployment protection | Runtime verification validates software post-deployment |
SIEM/XDR | Log correlation and alerts | Runtime verification is application- or process-level |

A new CSA report stresses getting out in front of AI risk — and why it matters for SecOps.

Trigger.dev's experience shows that you need modern controls to combat today's supply chain attacks.

Researchers explain that as threat actors move to AI-enabled malware in active operations, existing defenses will fail.