
Software quality's decline: How AI accelerates it
Development is in freefall toward software entropy and insecurity. Can spec-driven development help?
Runtime software verification is the process of validating the integrity, behavior, and security posture of software while it is actively running in production or pre-production environments. Unlike static testing or pre-deployment checks, runtime verification continuously monitors how software behaves under real-world conditions to detect anomalies, unauthorized changes, or malicious activity.
It ensures that deployed applications remain trustworthy and compliant throughout their operational lifecycle.
Even after rigorous pre-deployment testing, software can be compromised at runtime due to:
Runtime verification:
This is especially critical in regulated environments, Zero Trust architectures, and for mission-critical software systems.
Runtime verification typically involves:
This can be implemented through technologies like Runtime Application Self-Protection (RASP), eBPF-based sensors, endpoint detection agents, or kernel-level monitoring tools.
Practice | Focus Area | Key Differences |
|---|---|---|
Static Analysis | Source or binary review | Runtime verification observes live behavior, not code structure |
CI/CD Scanning | Pre-deployment protection | Runtime verification validates software post-deployment |
SIEM/XDR | Log correlation and alerts | Runtime verification is application- or process-level |

Development is in freefall toward software entropy and insecurity. Can spec-driven development help?

Gartner's Continuous Threat Exposure Management model represents an evolution from CVSS. Here’s what you need to know.

Google and others are inundating developers with AI-driven reporting. Are AI-enabled fixes the answer?