RL Blog

Spectra Assure Free Trial

Get your 14-day free trial of Spectra Assure for Software Supply Chain Security

Get Free TrialMore about Spectra Assure Free Trial
Blog
Events
About Us
Webinars
In the News
Careers
Demo Videos
Cybersecurity Glossary
Contact Us
reversinglabsReversingLabs: Home
Privacy PolicyCookiesImpressum
All rights reserved ReversingLabs © 2026
XX / TwitterLinkedInLinkedInFacebookFacebookInstagramInstagramYouTubeYouTubeblueskyBlueskyRSSRSS
Back to Top
The inaugural Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Software Supply Chain Security is outGET THE REPORT
Skip to main content
Contact UsSupportBlogCommunity
reversinglabs
ReversingLabs: Home
Solutions
Secure Software OnboardingSecure Build & ReleaseVerify AI Supply ChainIntegrate Safe Open SourceGo Beyond the SBOM
Increase Email Threat ResilienceDetect Malware in File Shares & StorageAdvanced Malware Analysis SuiteICAP Enabled Solutions
Scalable File AnalysisHigh-Fidelity Threat IntelligenceCurated Ransomware FeedAutomate Malware Analysis Workflows
Products & Technology
Spectra Assure®Software Supply Chain SecuritySpectra DetectHigh-Speed, High-Volume, Large File AnalysisSpectra AnalyzeIn-Depth Malware Analysis & Hunting for the SOCSpectra IntelligenceAuthoritative Reputation Data & Intelligence
Spectra CoreIntegrations
Industry
Energy & UtilitiesFinanceHealthcareHigh TechPublic Sector
Partners
Become a PartnerValue-Added PartnersTechnology PartnersMarketplacesOEM Partners
Alliances
Resources
BlogContent LibraryCybersecurity GlossaryConversingLabs PodcastEvents & WebinarsLearning with ReversingLabsWeekly Insights Newsletter
Customer StoriesDemo VideosDocumentationOpenSource YARA Rules
Company
About UsLeadershipCareersSeries B Investment
Events
Press ReleasesIn the News
Pricing
Software Supply Chain SecurityMalware Analysis and Threat Hunting
Request a demo
Menu
AppSec & Supply Chain Security
June 14, 2023

How to trust open source software: A conversation with OpenSSF's Naveen Srinivasan

ConversingLabs caught up with Srinivasan to discuss how OpenSSF's Security Scorecard can aid developers in assessing open source software components for their projects.

FacebookFacebookXX / TwitterLinkedInLinkedInblueskyBlueskyEmail Us

For software engineers to keep up with the pace of software delivery in the world of continuous delivery/continuous integration (CI/CD), they rely on open source codebases to meet deadlines and create a quality product. But while open source code is essential to developers — it has also become a major problem for secure software development.

The Synopsis 2021 Open Source Security and Risk Analysis Report found that 84% of all scanned codebases have at least one software vulnerability, with an average of 158 per codebase. This makes it incredibly easy for developers to accidentally use open source components that could have potential security vulnerabilities in them, creating application security and software supply chain security risk. 

The effort to review open source code for vulnerabilities is also a tedious task, making it less likely that harried software developers will review these dependencies to assess their security risk. This is why open source software developers created an essential tool known as OpenSSF Scorecard (also known as Security Scorecard). The tool, which is part of the Open Source Security Foundation, assesses open source projects for security risks through a series of automated checks. 

See also: OpenSSF's npm best practices: A solid first step — but trust issues remain

At this year’s RSA Conference in San Francisco, one of Security Scorecard’s maintainers, Naveen Srinivasan, presented alongside Brian Russell of Google to share how Security Scorecard works and why it’s an essential tool in better securing software applications and supply chains. 

ConversingLabs host Paul Roberts caught up with Srinivasan on the sidelines of RSAC to follow up with him on his presentation. The two discussed the following:

  • What Security Scorecard is
  • How the tool fits into the application security ecosystem
  • What dangers are currently present to the development process
  • How software vulnerabilities compare to other supply chain risks

Here is their conversation, ConversingLabs: How Do You Trust Open Source Software?:

The ConversingLabs episode is also available to watch on-demand — or listen to wherever you get your podcasts. 

Tags:AppSec & Supply Chain Security

More Blog Posts

Follow us

XX / TwitterLinkedInLinkedInFacebookFacebookInstagram
conversinglabs podcast title card how do you trust open source software

Join the free Spectra Assure Community today to get hands-on with RL's binary analysis-based software supply chain security platform.

Keep learning

  • Get up to speed on the agentic SOC in this webinar: Autonomy, Not Autopilot: Talking Agentic SOC. Plus: Learn about the new Agentic SOC Alliance.
  • Learn how Gartner® named RL a supply chain security 'visionary.' Download: Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Software Supply Chain Security.
  • Get key insights into why Gartner® said binary analysis is a must-have control in its recent CISO Playbook for Commercial Software Supply Chain Security.
  • Update your understanding of the Agentic Development Security tools landscape in this webinar with Forrester Sr. Analyst Janet Worthington.
  • Take a deep dive on the state of software security with RL's Software Supply Chain Security Report 2026. Plus: See the the webinar discussing the findings.

Explore RL's Spectra suite: Spectra Assure for software supply chain security,

Instagram
YouTubeYouTube
blueskyBluesky
Spectra Detect
for scalable file analysis,
Spectra Analyze
for malware analysis and threat hunting, and
Spectra Intelligence
for reputation data and intelligence.

This video is blocked because of your cookie preferences.

Subscribe

Get the best of RL Blog delivered to your in-box weekly. Stay up to date on key trends, analysis and best practices across threat intelligence and software supply chain security.

Related

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the riseFrontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containmentAI domain takeover takeaway: Focus on the harness not the model

Topics

All Blog PostsAppSec & Supply Chain SecurityDev & DevSecOpsProducts & TechnologySecurity OperationsThreat Research

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise

While prompt injection and data disclosure remain concerns, excessive agency climbed the list — not surprising with recent security incidents.

Learn More about OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise

Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment

The post-mortems of two compromises by rogue AI agents show that security teams need to focus on guardrails, not the AI model.

Learn More about Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment
Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment

AI domain takeover takeaway: Focus on the harness not the model

Research into an Active Directory takeover with a single AI prompt highlights why organizations need to focus on agentic SOCs.

Learn More about AI domain takeover takeaway: Focus on the harness not the model
AI domain takeover takeaway: Focus on the harness not the model
Robot agent
AI guardrails
Frontier AI controls