RL Blog

Spectra Assure Free Trial

Get your 14-day free trial of Spectra Assure for Software Supply Chain Security

Get Free TrialMore about Spectra Assure Free Trial
Blog
Events
About Us
Webinars
In the News
Careers
Demo Videos
Cybersecurity Glossary
Contact Us
reversinglabsReversingLabs: Home
Privacy PolicyCookiesImpressum
All rights reserved ReversingLabs © 2026
XX / TwitterLinkedInLinkedInFacebookFacebookInstagramInstagramYouTubeYouTubeblueskyBlueskyRSSRSS
Back to Top
The inaugural Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Software Supply Chain Security is outGET THE REPORT
Skip to main content
Contact UsSupportBlogCommunity
reversinglabs
ReversingLabs: Home
Solutions
Secure Software OnboardingSecure Build & ReleaseVerify AI Supply ChainIntegrate Safe Open SourceGo Beyond the SBOM
Increase Email Threat ResilienceDetect Malware in File Shares & StorageAdvanced Malware Analysis SuiteICAP Enabled Solutions
Scalable File AnalysisHigh-Fidelity Threat IntelligenceCurated Ransomware FeedAutomate Malware Analysis Workflows
Products & Technology
Spectra Assure®Software Supply Chain SecuritySpectra DetectHigh-Speed, High-Volume, Large File AnalysisSpectra AnalyzeIn-Depth Malware Analysis & Hunting for the SOCSpectra IntelligenceAuthoritative Reputation Data & Intelligence
Spectra CoreIntegrations
Industry
Energy & UtilitiesFinanceHealthcareHigh TechPublic Sector
Partners
Become a PartnerValue-Added PartnersTechnology PartnersMarketplacesOEM Partners
Alliances
Resources
BlogContent LibraryCybersecurity GlossaryConversingLabs PodcastEvents & WebinarsLearning with ReversingLabsWeekly Insights Newsletter
Customer StoriesDemo VideosDocumentationOpenSource YARA Rules
Company
About UsLeadershipCareersSeries B Investment
Events
Press ReleasesIn the News
Pricing
Software Supply Chain SecurityMalware Analysis and Threat Hunting
Request a demo
Menu
AppSec & Supply Chain SecurityAugust 8, 2024

Secure by Demand: Key takeaways for enterprise software buyers

CISA has released an add-on to its supply chain security initiative Secure by Design, with a focus on commercial software. Here’s what you need to know.

Carolynn van Arsdale, Writer, ReversingLabs.Carolynn van Arsdale
FacebookFacebookXX / TwitterLinkedIn
LinkedIn
blueskyBluesky
Email Us

Main Story

IntroHow to hold software producers accountableSoftware supply chain security doesn’t stop with guidance

This week, the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) took a major step forward as it continues to define federal software supply chain security policy. “Secure by Demand Guide: How Software Customers Can Drive a Secure Technology Ecosystem” serves as the official counterpart to the CISA’s landmark Secure by Design guidance (PDF), released in April 2023.

Secure by Design was one of the first federal initiatives aiming to shift the burden of software supply chain attacks away from the end user and onto those who create, ship, and maintain software products. Subsequently, CISA’s release of the Secure by Design Pledge just a few months ago further encouraged software producers to take steps to ensure they are following secure software development and maintaining practices.

But what was missing from Secure by Design’s message was a key piece of software supply chain security: the enterprise buyer. Commercial software risk remains one of the most under-addressed cybersecurity risks facing enterprises today. That's why security and risk leaders are inclined to check the security measures of the software products their enterprises are consuming. Secure by Demand embodies this sentiment.

Here are the key components of Secure by Demand, why they matter for enterprise buyers and software producers alike — and how enterprises can go beyond what CISA outlines.

Get White Paper: Assess & Manage Commercial Software RiskPlus: See the Webinar

How to hold software producers accountable

Secure by Demand aims to empower enterprise buyers with a set of checks that can be demanded of a software producer before, during, and after procurement. These checks speak not only to enterprise security, but also to product security, which CISA believes has been more of an afterthought when it comes to procurement compliance:

There are many compliance standards that organizations use during procurement that focus on enterprise security; conversely, relatively few focus on product security. This guide bridges that gap by offering resources organizations can leverage to assess product security maturity and whether a manufacturer follows secure by design principles.

Secure by Demand’s checks are presented as a list of questions that enterprise buyers can ask the software producer they wish to work with, including:

  • Have they taken CISA’s Secure by Design Pledge?
  • Do they make it simple for customers to install security patches?
  • Does the product support secure authentication (SSO, MFA, passkeys, and the elimination of default passwords)?
  • Is the software producer systematically addressing entire classes of vulnerabilities?
  • Are they able to provide security logs in the baseline version of their product?
  • Do they generate a software bill of materials (SBOM) and vet the security of open-source software components?
  • Are they transparent and timely in vulnerability reporting?

These checks serve as an important start in ensuring that software supply chain security is upheld from all ends of the software supply chain. By holding software producers accountable for these Secure by Design principles, enterprise buyers now hold the power in the software market to sway more companies to prioritize these secure software practices. This will also greatly benefit the enterprise buyer, because the risks posed to their company by commercial software use will be minimized.

Software supply chain security doesn’t stop with guidance

CISA’s release of Secure by Demand is just the beginning of a shake-up in software supply chain security. Charlie Jones, director of product management for software supply chain security at ReversingLabs, emphasized that accountability for software supply chain risk will only grow for both software producers and enterprise buyers.

For enterprise buyers of software, visibility into their supply chain is no longer optional. Emerging regulation demands that organization's demonstrate control over business-critical software, regardless of whether it was built or bought.

Charlie Jones

This increasing accountability for software supply chain security is warranted, given that the threat posed by commercial software use is only increasing. It was found in the 2024 Verizon Data Breach Investigations Report (DBIR) that breaches stemming from third-party software development organizations played a role in 15% of the more than 10,000 data breaches Verizon documented – a 68% jump from the 2023 DBIR. This uptick prompted Verizon’s callout for companies to “start looking at ways of making better choices” about which software providers they choose to work with “so as to not reward the weakest links in the chain.”

While Secure by Demand is right to point out the risks associated with vulnerabilities and open-source software components, breaches stemming from commercial software use can be caused by additional threats, such as malware insertion, tampering of the build environment, and secrets exposure. These kinds of threats have led to some of the most detrimental software supply chain attacks, including those on SolarWinds in 2020 and 3CX in 2023.

Minimizing commercial software risk in the long run will require both software producers and enterprise buyers to focus on all kinds of risk — not just some. Learn how to make your software supply chain security efforts as comprehensive as possible with our whitepaper “Assess & Manage Commercial Software Risk.”

Tags:AppSec & Supply Chain Security

More Blog Posts

Main Story

IntroHow to hold software producers accountableSoftware supply chain security doesn’t stop with guidance

Follow us

XX / TwitterLinkedInLinkedInFacebookFacebookInstagram
smiling woman with glasses
secure by design secure by demand sign

Join the free Spectra Assure Community today to get hands-on with RL's binary analysis-based software supply chain security platform.

Keep learning

  • Get up to speed on the agentic SOC in this webinar: Autonomy, Not Autopilot: Talking Agentic SOC. Plus: Learn about the new Agentic SOC Alliance.
  • Learn how Gartner® named RL a supply chain security 'visionary.' Download: Gartner® Magic Quadrant™ for Software Supply Chain Security.
  • Get key insights into why Gartner® said binary analysis is a must-have control in its recent CISO Playbook for Commercial Software Supply Chain Security.
  • Update your understanding of the Agentic Development Security tools landscape in this webinar with Forrester Sr. Analyst Janet Worthington.
  • Take a deep dive on the state of software security with RL's Software Supply Chain Security Report 2026. Plus: See the the webinar discussing the findings.

Explore RL's Spectra suite: Spectra Assure for software supply chain security,

Instagram
YouTubeYouTube
blueskyBluesky
Spectra Detect
for scalable file analysis,
Spectra Analyze
for malware analysis and threat hunting, and
Spectra Intelligence
for reputation data and intelligence.

Subscribe

Get the best of RL Blog delivered to your in-box weekly. Stay up to date on key trends, analysis and best practices across threat intelligence and software supply chain security.

Related

AI worms are coming — and signatures won't stop themOWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the riseFrontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment

Topics

All Blog PostsAppSec & Supply Chain SecurityDev & DevSecOpsProducts & TechnologySecurity OperationsThreat Research

AI worms are coming — and signatures won't stop them

Researchers have built a worm that reasons about each host it infects, and the open-weight models powering it sit outside safety controls AI providers have built.

Learn More about AI worms are coming — and signatures won't stop them
AI worms are coming — and signatures won't stop them

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise

While prompt injection and data disclosure remain concerns, excessive agency climbed the list — not surprising with recent security incidents.

Learn More about OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise
OWASP Top 10 for LLM Apps 2026: Excessive agency risk on the rise

Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment

The post-mortems of two compromises by rogue AI agents show that security teams need to focus on guardrails, not the AI model.

Learn More about Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment
Frontier AI agents: Only as safe as their containment
AI brain agent hoodie
Robot agent
AI guardrails